. An Unlikely Story: the Radio Times sells badger culling | London Progressive Journal
A non-partisan journal of the left.

An Unlikely Story: the Radio Times sells badger culling

Tue 8th Mar 2016

The latest issue of the Radio Times must be making anti-badger culling people spitting mad.  An article titled An Unlikely Star by Terry Payne, is advertising a programme, Land of Hope and Glory, being broadcast by BBC2 on Friday 4 March at 9 pm. 

 

As Mark Jones (veterinarian and policy manager, Born Free Foundation) comments: 

 

The article paints a wholly inaccurate and biased picture of the situation facing cattle farmers affected by bovine tuberculosis. 

   

Jane Treays whose film it is has, on her own admission, set out to make a very partisan case for culling badgers.  As quoted by Payne, she says: 

 

“There is a massacre of our dairy herds going on and it is not being covered”. 

 

The ‘massacre’ is the number of cattle being slaughtered because of bovine TB – around 30,000 a year (not all of which have bTB).  What is never mentioned is the greater ‘massacre’ of cattle slaughtered for other reasons.  For example, in 2008 75,000 were slaughtered because they were infertile. 

 

Nor can Treays claim that the issue of bTB in cattle is not being covered.  It constantly appears in the Western Region media (and elsewhere), in farming programmes on radio and TV and papers devoted to farming.  And far more space is granted to the NFU and farmers wanting to cull badgers than is given to those people trying to argue on scientific grounds that badger culls won’t help the farmers or their cattle. 

 

The ‘unlikely star’ of Treays’ film is Somerset farmer Maurice Durbin who has had TB on his farm since 2010. Faced with that information, Jan Bayley of the Animal Welfare Group commented: 

 

“To have continuous incidents suggests that TB is endemic in his herd. 

 

One wonders whether the vets and Defra inspectors constantly visiting his farm had ever suggested as much.  Mark Jones agrees: 

 

Bovine TB is a significant problem for our cattle industry.  This problem has been exacerbated in recent years because of cattle farming and trading practices which are not focussed on disease control, and by successive governments which took their eye off the ball, particularly during the BSE and FMD crises.  So much so, that in some parts of the west and south west the disease has effectively become endemic. 

 

In fact, the strong possibility of endemic bTB in herds is something that should be taken very seriously, studied and acted upon.  Durbin has lost a third of his 320-strong pedigree Guernsey herd to the disease which, so the article says, is often transmitted in the urine of badgers.  And note, not badgers possibly infected with bTB, just badgers.  There are theories as to how transmission between cattle and badgers takes place, but nothing is proven. 

 

Mark Jones adds: 

 

Many wild animals can contract bovine TB, and badgers can certainly carry the infection.  But shooting large numbers of mostly healthy badgers will not help cattle farmers tackle a problem their industry has created. 

 

The fundamental difficulty with bovine TB is that the primary test used to determine whether cattle are infected only detects between 50-80% of the infected animals, leaving anything from one-in-five to one-in-two (that is anything between 20 and 50 per cent) of infected animals in the herd to continue spreading the infection.  With ever larger herds this creates a huge problem, and is the reason so many herds suffer multiple breakdowns.  

 

Durbin’s farm has been ‘effectively closed for all this time’.  Of course it has.  Mark Jones continues: 

 

“The testing limitations mean that, in order to control the spread of disease, very strict testing regimes must be introduced and adhered to, movement restrictions on known infected herds and farm biosecurity measures must be rigorous, and enforced risk-based trading is essential to ensure clean herds do not become infected from herds, which though declared ‘disease free’ actually still harbour infection. 

 

These are the measures which enabled bovine TB to be successfully brought under control back in the late 1950s and 1960s during the so-called ‘area eradication strategy’. Under that scheme, the number of cattle slaughtered because of bovine TB was reduced from a peak of 25,000 in 1959, to less than 10% of that figure a decade later. It’s worth noting we didn’t even know badgers could be infected with bovine TB until 1971.” 

 

Treays says: 

 

“We hear lots about the inhumanity of culling badgers, but nothing about the 30,000 cattle that are being shot each year because of TB. 

 

Being shot?  Does Treays know anything about the slaughter of cattle in abattoirs?  She claims that she ‘loves’ badgers and that it was right that they had become a protected species but: 

 

now it is out of balance.  The job of protecting them is done.” 

 

Seeing that badgers are still dug out of their setts for badger baiting, most would disagree with that.  She continues: 

 

“No one is speaking up for the dairy industry… We have got to have a more reasoned debate.” 

 

The NFU is constantly bleating about the state of the dairy industry, the price of milk, the threat of bTB and the necessity of culling badgers.  But it refuses absolutely to have a reasoned debate with the scientists.  

 

Yet as Mark Jones says: 

 

“Playing the ‘badger blame game’ will not solve the bovine TB problem for farmers.  The ‘massacre’ of cattle must of course be tackled, but not by massacring badgers, which won’t help struggling farmers and may well make things considerably worse.” 

 

Payne’s article ends: 

 

A tearful farmer Durbin is clear where the blame lies. “It’s the bloody do-gooders.  They interfere with everything we do.” 

 

By ‘do-gooders’ does he means scientists, vets and wildlife experts?

You must be logged in to post comments on the site or you can use Facebook above.