Two months ago, swathes of – mostly – poor and angry young men (and some women) took to the streets to express an anger with a society that handed out schoolmasterly tellings-off under the guise of sound advice. To them, violence seemed a more direct form of expression than the ballot box that never changes anything, or Westminster’s institutional duplicity.
David Cameron became the headmaster-hypocrite from Lindsay Anderson’s 1968 film, If, starring Malcolm McDowell as an English public school revolutionary. The headmaster, played by Peter Jeffrey, was the benign dictator of the 21st-century “new totalitarianism”; said one thing but meant another, blamed the system on its victims, and more than anything, had to come across as reasonable, tough on crime (dissent), but a jolly good chap nonetheless. Clipped, educated and well-heeled in condescension, Jeffrey could well have been playing David Cameron.
There is no greater example of this duplicitous image-making than the Conservative’s Big Society. It is the Tories’ most ingenious policy since Thatcherism, because it gives them something to hide everything behind. The Big Society can even hide the party’s latent Thatcherism -almost.
A YouGov poll in May found 59% of pollsters agreed with the statement, “The Big Society is mostly just hot air, and is being used as a cover for the Government while they cut investment in public services.” 71% thought the policies “probably wouldn’t work.”
In the days after the riots, our Prime Minister displayed his own well-honed skill for sounding like a schoolmaster chiding a nation of subservient, and occasionally disobedient, children. His speech celebrated our “great country of good people” but didn’t shy from saying what needed to be said.
“These riots were not about race,” he said. “The perpetrators and the victims were white, black and Asian. These riots were not about government cuts: they were directed at high street stores, not Parliament. And these riots were not about poverty: that insults the millions of people who, whatever the hardship, would never dream of making others suffer like this.”
Cameron was contradicting what he said in his 2006 “hug a hoodie” speech, that so-called criminality was the product of its background. The time for that pseudo-socialist lip-service had passed now. “Of course,” Cameron said. “We mustn’t oversimplify. No, this was about behaviour.”
Wrong again. The Riots were a product of Cameron’s Big Society. For two years commentators had mocked all the BS because nobody knew what it meant. It didn’t mean anything, they said. In one sense they were right. It didn’t.
But it wasn’t just a cover, the Big Society was part and parcel to the bitterest of all pills – the cuts. By encouraging volunteerism, community spirit and hard work, the Tories were only preparing us for their own policies. It is like Thatcher telling Yorkshire miners in 1982 to apply for a job in a call centre.
And this is the genius of the Big Society. It taps into the mythology of traditional Toryism, that each and every crime, Labour government and sleaze scandal is part of an ever-declining “twisted moral code.”
By constantly moving the goal-posts, and taking their Big Society with them, the Tories can explain away the closure of 17 benefit-processing Jobcentres nationwide (costing 2,400 jobs), cuts to other front-line services like youth clubs; how four out of five local authorities are cutting library services; 25% unemployment amongst young people, and national unemployment increasing by 80,000 in the three months up to July, bringing the figure to 2.51 million (7.9%).
Many of these actual results are in direct opposition to the claims of the Big Society. They are guilty of class war, dire social fragmentation and the breaking of all kinds of mandates made before the 2010 election. So you can’t knock them for their brazenness. They’re just incredibly arrogant, insatiable, and brim-full of snobbery and self-confidence.
The truth is – and always will be – Cameron and the Tories made this. They have created a clever, elaborate and utterly shameless myth behind which they are continuing the Thatcherite project of global capitalism, mass privatisation and domestic self-destruction – and well into the 21st-century.
This article originally appeared on Enlightenment BluesTags: Domestic (UK)
Categorised in: Article
This post was written by Tom Rollins