The southern most region of
Now nearly a year on the opinion polls put the PSOE firmly back in the lead. The socialists account for 38 per cent of the votes, four more than the PP. This level of support would not allow PSOE to govern on its own; it would still need the backing of the far left Izquierda Unida in a coalition – the exact formation that governs AndalucÃa now.
These are the conclusions of a study by Capdea – part of the
This dramatic collapse, after the November 2011 general election triumph, was first brought on by the PP’s mishandling of the financial crisis. Add to that recent major corruption scandals engulfing the party at the highest levels. However Capdea took its soundings before the full implications of the BÃ¡rcenas corruption scandal became known. This fiasco surrounds the former treasurer of the PP after it emerged that he had secret overseas bank accounts and had made under the table payments to PP politicians. Without a doubt, the fortunes of the PP have continued to plummet.
The reason the socialists are back in front has a lot to do with the fall of the PP rather than any major backing for PSOE whose approval ratings are dire. Indeed, where voters have switched to the left they have chosen the far left Communist-led Izquierda Unida (IU) which Capdea says commands 14.2 per cent of the vote.
PSOE now has 38 per cent of the vote and the PP has 34.4 per cent. At the March general election, the PP took 40.6 per cent of the vote, PSOE 39.5 per cent, so both are down on that level. However the IU has seen a boost to its popularity, gaining 14.2 per cent of the vote.
So what is the bad news for Spanish democracy? The large scale rejection of main stream politicians, their parties and institutions which is not only dire news for them but also for the democratic process.
If Spaniards reject mainstream politicians, it leaves the door open for a modern day Franco figure to emerge promising to clean up corruption and offering stable, firm government.
Capdea reports that 46 per cent of those people questioned would not vote if a snap election were to be held; instead they would abstain. Indeed, the wide ranging survey shows the Spanish people’s disillusionment across the board with politicians, their parties and the major institutions. The only two to receive positive approval ratings were universities and the Ombudsman who battle on behalf of the people.
The overriding findings are a thumbs down for all politicians. Despite the socialists returning as the major party in AndalucÃa and the increase in support for the IU, 51.9 per cent of people in the region believe the PSOE-IU coalition is performing poorly. Only 23.8 per cent approve of its efforts. The PP, as an opposition party, is rated by 68.7 per cent as doing badly and can only muster an approval rating of 14 per cent.
At a national level, both the PP government of Rajoy and the opposition led by the PSOE are in serious negative territory. Seventy-one per cent of Andalucians rate the PP government as bad or very bad and 72 per cent rate the PSOE opposition of Rubalcaba as bad also.
In the BÃ¡rcenas scandal, Rubalcaba has called for the resignation of Rajoy because he is seemingly implicated. However, the PSOE leader has steered clear of calling for a general election for one simple reason: he knows that the socialists would suffer as badly as the governing PP. Spanish voters are rejecting both major parties leaving a vacuum in the nation’s democracy and that is very bad news indeed.
BÃRCENAS CASE: The centre-left Spanish national newspaper El PaÃs has made much of the case revolving around Luis BÃ¡rcenas.
El PaÃs has published secret ledgers that appear to show that BÃ¡rcenas was behind a slush fund at the PP, which saw thousands of Euros paid out over a number of years to high-ranking members of the party, including
The PP insisted it broke off relations with its former treasurer in 2009 but it is alleged BÃ¡rcenas continued to receive preferential treatment from the party until this January with an office at the party’s
Categorised in: Article
This post was written by David Eade