Iraq: US, UK Fabricated WMD Threat

March 3, 2016 12:00 am Published by Leave your thoughts

“Things come apart so easily when they have been held together with lies.” (Dorothy Allison, b. 1949)

On 7th September 2002, speaking at a Press Conference flanked by Prime Minister, Tony “dodgy dossier” Blair, President George W Bush stated that Saddam Hussein was just six months away from an Iraqi nuclear age [1]. The timeline, said Bush, had come from the International Atomic Energy Agency Report issued that morning.

Blair confirmed ” . . . The threat from Saddam Hussein and weapons of mass destruction ‘ that threat is real. We only need to look at the Report from the International Atomic Energy Agency this morning, showing what has been going on at the former nuclear weapon sites, to realize that.”

There was no report from the IAEA “that morning.” The report to which Bush and Blair were referring was from 1998 and included:

” . . . based on all credible information available to date . . . the IAEA has found no indication of Iraq having achieved its program goal of producing nuclear weapons or of Iraq having retained a physical capability for the production of weapon- useable nuclear material or having clandestinely obtained such material.”

The pair continued to stress the lie of the immediacy of the report with Bush replying to a question from an AP journalist with the preamble: “We just heard the Prime Minister talk about the new report ‘” [2]

When the story was further challenged, a White House spokesperson even stated the report might, in fact, have come from 1991. The chief IAEA spokesman denied any such 1991 report.


Of course, in 1991 every factory (including those making glass, cement and bricks) every military facility, chicken farm, agricultural processing unit, the whole industrial infrastructure, was erased by coalition bombs, with the US and UK liberally spreading radiation throughout the region with their depleted uranium missiles. Iraq had no nuclear capability but the country and the region would pay the price in cancers and birth deformities until the end of time, poisoned by up to 900 tonnes of residual radioactive and chemically toxic dust which also seeped in to the water, earth, fauna and flora – thus inhaled and ingested by the population. Black ironies do not come darker.

The scorched earth onslaught of 2003 and subsequent years of bombings brought further radioactive pollution in orders of magnitude. The US is now bombing again.

Iraq’s French built Osirak nuclear reactor at Tuwaitha had been destroyed by Israel on 7th June 1981, before it came on line. The warehouse in France housing the wherewithal for the reactor, awaiting shipment, was blown up. As the US and Israel call their destructions by silly names, this one was called “Operation Opera.” The Tuwaitha complex was bombed again by the US in 1991.

Imad Khadduri, author of “Iraq’s Nuclear Mirage ” and eminent Iraqi nuclear scientist, is adamant that the nuclear programme was abandoned on the orders of Saddam Hussein after the 1991 war, with those involved directed to sign a commitment to that effect by President Saddam.

The relevance of the above is, of course, that Iraq was destroyed on a nuclear lie, whilst the nuclear reality is that the actions, primarily of the US and the UK, have poisoned the land and the people with nuclear and chemical lethality for all time. The half life of depleted uranium is 4.5 billion years. The soaring rate of cancers and birth defects have been linked to this nuclear nightmare.


When the US invaded, the first mission of the troops was to secure the Oil Ministry, the oil fields and the oil industrial infrastructure. Weapons of Mass Destruction, the lie behind the war, came a distant second in terms of concerns. The Tuwaitha complex, developed as the Baghdad Nuclear Research Facility in the early 1960s, an approximately 120 acre complex around 18 km south of Baghdad, was ignored. A decision of criminal negligence.

The large complex in which numerous buildings held decades worth of lethal nuclear materials from the abandoned nuclear programme had been sealed by the IAEA and was further protected by steel doors and over four hundred round-the- clock guards.

Five weeks after the invasion, The Washington Post’s Barton Gellman wrote [3]:

“Before the war began last month, the vast Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center held 3,896 pounds of partially enriched uranium, more than 94 tons of natural uranium and smaller quantities of cesium, cobalt and strontium, according to reports compiled through the 1990s by inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency. Immensely valuable on the international black market, the uranium was in a form suit able for further enrichment to ‘weapons grade’, the core of a nuclear device. The other substances, products of medical and industrial waste, emit intense radiation. They have been sought, officials said, by terrorists seeking to build a so-called dirty bomb, which uses conventional explosives to scatter dangerous radioactive particles.”

Tuwaitha, with its at least 409 barrels of nuclear materials, would be a terrorists dream.

“Defense officials acknowledge that the U S government has no idea whether any of Tuwaitha’s potentially deadly contents have been stolen, because it has not dispatched investigators to appraise the site. What it does know, according to officials at the Pentagon and US Central Command, is that the sprawling campus ‘ lay unguarded for days and that looters made their way inside. ” (Emphasis added).

As “Operation Iraqi Liberation” (OIL) engulfed Iraq, the guards had fled for their lives.

Incredibly: “Disputes inside the U S Defense Department and with other government agencies have slowed the preparation of orders for a team of nuclear experts to assess Tuwaitha, officials said. Though it anticipated for months that war would leave it with responsibility for Iraq’s nuclear infrastructure, the Bush administration did not reach consensus on the role it would seek at those facilities.”

Corey Hinderstein, Deputy Director of the Institute for Science and International Security, found it “extremely surprising” when told that US nuclear experts had not yet been to Tuwaitha. “I would have hoped that they would try to assess as quickly as possible whether the site had been breached. If there is radiological material on the loose, with the chance that it may be transferred across borders, it would be extremely important to know that (in order) to prevent it from crossing a border or being transferred to a terrorist or another state.” (Emphasis added).

In addition to their scarcely believable fecklessness with the most lethal of materials, the US and UK insurgents left the borders wide open – a situation remaining thirteen years on.


Defence analyst Andy Oppenheimer, a specialist in counter-terrorism and chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear weapons and explosives, wrote a meticulously detailed, chilling document, published in October 2003, on the resultant tragedy [4]. Radiological material was certainly “on the loose in Iraq” and the results were locally catastrophic. What might have happened – or might still happen – further afield is seemingly unknown.

What is known is that hundreds of barrels were stolen from the abandoned plant, the radioactive and chemical content tipped out, and the barrels used to collect water for cooking, washing, and storage. Water treatment plants and facilities had been bombed and water was collected by any means possible from rivers and rain. The lethally contaminated barrels were a boon.

Oppenheimer wrote:

“There has been growing concern over radiation poisoning in the neighbourhoods near al-Tuwaitha. Local doctors have reported cases of radiation sickness in nearby villages. There are also fears that local farms as well as the water supply may have been contaminated in the post-war chaos. According to local doctors, as many as 2,000 residents in the villages near the site have been showing the tell tale symptoms of acute radiation sickness – nosebleeds, rashes, hair loss, respiratory distress, and vomiting. People have drunk water stored in plastic barrels stolen from the complex. One local fruit merchant’s children fell ill after drinking the water.

“Doctors fear that hundreds could have been contaminated and may have ingested radioactive material. An Iraqi nuclear engineer and a founder of the al-Tuwaitha site, Dr Hamid Al- Bah’ly, interviewed on Al-Jazeera TV, witnessed the spread of nuclear contamination firsthand. At one home, Al-Bah’ly discovered radioactive contamination in clothes and beds. In others, he recorded radiation levels 500 to 600 times higher than acceptable levels. Iraqi and foreign doctors are to conduct a major health survey in the affected areas near al-Tuwaitha; during June there was talk of evacuating villagers. Radiation sickness aside, the risk of Iraqis who have been contaminated contracting leukaemia and other cancers at a later date appears very high. ”

The paper highlights: “the danger of radioactive materials falling into the hands of terrorists seeking to make radiological dispersion devices (RDDs – dubbed ‘dirty bombs’). There is clearly potential for looted materials to be sold on by looters to terrorist groups seeking to make RDDs.”

US intelligence had shown Al Qaeda’s interest in the use of radioactive weapons. Intelligence whose priority was non- existent in protecting the wherewithal to create such horrors in a region where Al-Qaeda literally seemed to enter Iraq with the troops and whose offspring, the adherents of ISIS, regard death as a prize not a fear and surely woul d not have a moment’s concern in irradiating entire regions, adding to the burden of what the US has already done.


Now Iraq has a new nuclear threat. The theft has come to light “of a highly dangerous radioactive source of Iridium – 192 with highly radioactive activity”┬»from a depot…in the Rafidhia area of Basra province.” [5] Though the material went missing in November, the disappearance has only just come to light.

“The material is classed as a Category 2 radioactive by the International Atomic Energy Agency – meaning it can be fatal to anyone in close proximity to it in a matter of days or even hours.”

Moreover, “A security official said the initial investigation suggested the perpetrators had specific knowledge of how to handle the material and how to gain access to the facility” where it was stored. Army and police are working “day and night” to locate the stolen material, a spokesman for Basra Operations Command told Reuters. Nearly four months on it seems they are not doing too well.

Iridium -192 is used in industrial photography to locate flaws in metal components as well as in radiotherapy. It seemingly belonged to the giant Turkey based SGS group whose ” ‘ robust technology, knowledge-based approach and dedication to quality and safety allow us to provide innovative solutions to every part of the oil and gas industry” and was being used to test pipes at an oil field.

It was reportedly being kept in a protective laptop-sized case in a depot belonging to US oilfield services company Weatherford. The isotope was apparently being used to check for flaws in oil piping etc. in Basra’s great oil industry, so speedily secured by the invaders.

However, both SGS and Weatherford deny responsibility for the disastrous loss, and according to Reuters are trading recriminations [6].

Supremely ironically, under the decimating embargo years, Iraq was not even allowed chemotherapy to treat the rocketing cancer rate, X-rays or any therapeutic radiation. Saddam would somehow transform them into nuclear weapons US-UK Inc. fantasized.

Iraq now lives in an uncontrollable, nightmare nuclear age, delivered by Bush and Blair’s lies, bombs and actions.


As this article was being finished, it was quietly announced that the missing Iridium-192 had been located outside a gas station in Zubair, in Basra Province. It was stated that the container had not been breached and no radioactivity had been released. There has seemingly been an independent inspection by the relevant authorities of a lethal substance on the loose for over three months.

Extensive inquiries have so far failed to confirm whether an inventory of what went missing from Tuwaitha, and other sites from the abandoned nuclear programme, was undertaken. Inquiries will continue.








Categorised in:

This post was written by Felicity Arbuthnot

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *